Value-at-Risk Theory and Practice

The first advanced book on value-at-risk

Chapter 4, Page 170
Exercise 3

In this exercise, you will demonstrate that sample variance estimator [4.5] is biased but that alternative estimator [4.27] is unbiased.

a. First prove a technical result that will be needed for the derivations. Prove that, given any set of numbers {x[1], x[2], ... , x[m]} whose average is :

[4.25]

b. Derive a formula for the bias of estimator [4.5].

c. Modify your derivation from (b) to obtain a formula for the bias of [4.27].

Solution

a. We first prove the technical result. This involves no random quantities. It is just algebra:

[s1]

[s2]
[s3]
[s4]
[s5]

b. We next use our technical result to determine the bias of the sample variance estimator

[4.5]

The derivation is

[s6]

[s7]
[s8]
[s9]
[s10]

For the next step in the derivation, we apply the result of Exercise 3.15 twice:

[s11]

[s12]
[s13]

We conclude that sample estimator [4.5] is biased.

c. Finally, we determine the bias of the alternative estimator of variance:

[4.27]

which we can denote

[s14]

The derivation largely parallels that of part (b):

[s15]

[s16]
[s17]
[s18]
[s19]
[s20]
[s21]
[s22]
[s23]

Estimator [4.27] is unbiased.

 

website: http://www.contingencyanalysis.com
value-at-risk direct link: http://www.value-at-risk.net
copyright © Contingency Analysis, 2003